just ran across the one from michigan that I mentioned earlier - considering the qty I think he got a pretty good deal http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2014/02/store_owner_sentenced_for_sell.html and this one for a more obscure example http://www.clickondetroit.com/sports/datsyuk-merchandise-lawsuit-heads-to-court-thursday/21568454 just examples for future readers, even though the items are no longer for sale and the companies closed the suits continue to be litigated - in the digital age nothing is erased for good. in both examples the person with the items got the first suit then they go after the person that produced the products even after they have been removed from the marketplace, the first infraction happens at the time of manufacture and doesn't disappear. everyone chooses their own risk they are willing to take